We See The Sacred From Afar, To See It The Same

Author(s)

  • Robin Hanson

Full text (open access)

Abstract

  • 68 reported correlates of treating things as “sacred” are listed, and collected into seven themes. Most can be plausibly explained via two hypotheses. The first, taken from Durkheim, is that treating things as sacred mainly functions to bind groups together via a shared view of it. The second hypothesis, suggested by psychology’s construal level theory, is that humans acquired a habit of seeing sacred things as if from afar, even when they are close, to more consistently see those things the same as others in their groups.

Date

  • June, 2023

Citation

Areas

  • Psychology, Social Sciences

References

1. Susanne Adler, Marko Sarstedt (2021) “Mapping the jungle: A bibliometric analysis of research into construal level theory” Psychology and Marketing 38(9): 1367-1383, September. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21537

2. Russell W. Belk, Melanie Wallendorf, and John F. Sherry, Jr. (1989) “The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey” Journal of Consumer Research , 16(1): 1-38, June. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2489299

3. Gregory Berns, Emily Bell, C. Monica Capra, Michael Prietula, Sara Moore, Brittany Anderson, Jeremy Ginges and Scott Atran (2012) “The price of your soul: neural evidence for the non-utilitarian representation of sacred values” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367(1589), March 5. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0262

4. Emile Durkheim (1995) [1915] The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, translated by Karen Fields. New York: The Free Press.

5. Dacher Keltner (2023) Awe: The New Science of Everyday Wonder and How It Can Transform Your Life. Penguin Press.

6. Nira Liberman, Yaacov Trope (2008) “The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now” Science 322(5905):1201-1205, November 21. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1161958

7. Nira Liberman, Yaacov Trope (2003) “Construal level theory of intertemporal judgment and decision” In G. Loewenstein, D. Read, & R. Baumeister (Eds.), Time and decision: Economic and psychological perspectives on intertemporal choice (pp. 245–276). Russell Sage Foundation.

8. Nicola Righetti (2014) “The Sacred in Current Social Sciences Research”. Italian Sociological Review, 4 (1):133-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.13136/isr.v4i1.77

9. Felix Septianto, Yuri Seo, Loic Pengtao Li, Linsong Shi (2021) “Awe in Advertising: The Mediating Role of an Abstract Mindset” Journal of Advertising, June 21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1931578

10. Frederick Streng (2000) “Sacred”Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/sacred

11. Philip Tetlock (2003) “Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(7):320-324, July.

12. Stuart Torr, Tracy Craig (2013). “Addressing dualism in mathematical abstraction: an argument for the role of Construal Level Theory in mathematics education.” Proceedings of Delta ’13, The Ninth Southern Hemisphere Conference on the Teaching and Learning of Undergraduate Mathematics, pp 199-208.

13. Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963

14. Yufeng Zhang, Mo Luan, Hong Li, and Yiling Ren (2021) Social Psychology “Intuition Versus Deliberation: How Decision Mode Influences Desirability and Feasibility Preferences 52(2):114-124. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000442